embedding on the pit journal from PIT Journal on Vimeo.
videos
read, rate, review cycle 2 from PIT Journal on Vimeo.
About Academic Conferences from PIT Journal on Vimeo.
peer-to-peer replies from PIT Journal on Vimeo.
Main menu
User login
peersourcing traditions
"His neighbours are better judges than people at a distance his associates and fellow-countrymen better than strangers; his contemporaries better than posterity; sensible persons better than foolish ones; a large number of people better than a small number: those of the former class, in each case, are the more likely to be good judges of him"
— Aristotle
The Rhetoric
peersourcing strategies
Your role as a peersourcer is to help the writer strengthen his/her submission.
During the early stages of the review process, when a writer has marked a submission with "just thinking" or "drafting," your goal is to provide global feedback on the writer's topic or angle. Try to help the writer understand whether his/her topic is interesting to an audience of UNC undergraduates and make recommendations about what might make the submission more compelling to this audience.
---
As you read, rate, and review submissions you are engaging in composing as a social practice, helping the writer understand how an audience is actually responding to the piece.
---
As a writer, try to use the readers reactions to your work to help you understand whether your current composing strategies are effective for this audience and to help you find ways to make your revisions more effective.
